RIPE-KG · Version 1.1.0 · Resource
ripekg:work/10.1016%2Fj.jclinepi.2019.09.004
https://w3id.org/ripe/ripe-kg/work/10.1016%2Fj.jclinepi.2019.09.004
| Subject | Predicate | Object |
|---|---|---|
ripekg:work/10.1016%2Fj.jclinepi.2019.09.004Rapid reviews of medical tests used many similar methods to systematic reviews but key items were rarely reported: a scoping review |
prism:doi |
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.09.004 |
ripekg:work/10.1016%2Fj.jclinepi.2019.09.004Rapid reviews of medical tests used many similar methods to systematic reviews but key items were rarely reported: a scoping review |
dcterms:title |
Rapid reviews of medical tests used many similar methods to systematic reviews but key items were rarely reported: a scoping review |
ripekg:work/10.1016%2Fj.jclinepi.2019.09.004Rapid reviews of medical tests used many similar methods to systematic reviews but key items were rarely reported: a scoping review |
rdf:type |
node1 |
ripekg:work/10.1016%2Fj.jclinepi.2019.09.004Rapid reviews of medical tests used many similar methods to systematic reviews but key items were rarely reported: a scoping review |
rdf:type |
http://purl.org/spar/fabio/Work |
ripekg:work/10.1016%2Fj.jclinepi.2019.09.004Rapid reviews of medical tests used many similar methods to systematic reviews but key items were rarely reported: a scoping review |
rdf:type |
rdfs:Resource |
ripekg:work/10.1016%2Fj.jclinepi.2019.09.004Rapid reviews of medical tests used many similar methods to systematic reviews but key items were rarely reported: a scoping review |
rdf:type |
owl:Thing |
ripekg:work/10.1016%2Fj.jclinepi.2019.09.004Rapid reviews of medical tests used many similar methods to systematic reviews but key items were rarely reported: a scoping review |
rdf:type |
prov:Entity |
ripekg:work/10.1016%2Fj.jclinepi.2019.09.004Rapid reviews of medical tests used many similar methods to systematic reviews but key items were rarely reported: a scoping review |
rdf:type |
ripe:WorkWork |
ripekg:work/10.1016%2Fj.jclinepi.2019.09.004Rapid reviews of medical tests used many similar methods to systematic reviews but key items were rarely reported: a scoping review |
owl:sameAs |
https://semopenalex.org/work/W2972873725 |
ripekg:work/10.1136%2Fbmjebm-2024-113391Over 1000 terms have been used to describe evidence synthesis: a scoping review |
http://purl.org/spar/cito/cites |
ripekg:work/10.1016%2Fj.jclinepi.2019.09.004Rapid reviews of medical tests used many similar methods to systematic reviews but key items were rarely reported: a scoping review |