RIPE-KG · Version 1.1.0 · Resource
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-1
https://w3id.org/ripe/ripe-kg/peer-comment/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-1
| Subject | Predicate | Object |
|---|---|---|
ripekg:evaluation/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2 |
prov:used |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-1 |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-1 |
dcterms:creator |
ripekg:author/pubpeer-RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-1Ben Goldacre |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-1 |
dcterms:date |
August 2016 |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-1 |
http://purl.org/spar/fabio/hasURL |
https://pubpeer.com/publications/8C904DDC6613F3E67E532A33130B13 |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-1 |
rdf:type |
http://purl.org/spar/fabio/Comment |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-1 |
rdf:type |
rdfs:Resource |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-1 |
rdf:type |
owl:Thing |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-1 |
rdf:type |
ripe:IntegrityAssessmentEvidenceIntegrity assessment evidence |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-1 |
rdf:type |
ripe:PeerCommentPeer comment |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-1 |
rdf:type |
tido:Evidence |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-1 |
prov:wasAttributedTo |
ripekg:source/pubpeerPubPeer |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-1 |
prov:wasGeneratedBy |
ripekg:evidence-aggregation/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2 |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-1 |
prov:wasMemberOf |
ripekg:research-integrity-assessment/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2 |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-1 |
https://schema.org/text |
This trial has the wrong trial registry ID associated with it on PubMed: both in the XML on PubMed, and in the body of the text of the article. The ID given is NCT0151529. We believe the correct ID, which we have found by hand searching, is [NCT01515293](https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01515293). This comment is being posted as part of the [OpenTrials.net](http://opentrials.net) project[1], an open database threading together all publicly accessible documents and data on each trial, globally. In the course of creating the database, and matching documents and data sources about trials from different locations, we have identified various anomalies in datasets such as PubMed, and in published papers. Alongside documenting the prevalence of problems, we are also attempting to correct these errors and anomalies wherever possible, by feeding back to the originators. We have corrected this data in the [OpenTrials.net](http://opentrials.net) database; we hope that this trial’s text and metadata can also be corrected at source, in PubMed and in the accompanying paper. Many thanks, Jessica Fleminger, Ben Goldacre* [1] Goldacre, B., Gray, J., 2016. OpenTrials: towards a collaborative open database of all available information on all clinical trials. Trials 17. doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1290-8 Dr Ben Goldacre BA MA MSc MBBS MRCPsych Senior Clinical Research Fellow [](mailto:) [www.ebmDataLab.net](http://www.ebmDataLab.net) Centre for Evidence Based Medicine Department of Primary Care Health Sciences University of Oxford Radcliffe Observatory Quarter Woodstock Road Oxford OX2 6GG |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-1 |
ripe:concerns |
ripekg:work/10.1097%2Fsla.0b013e318278d225Randomized Prospective Study to Compare Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Umbilical Single-Incision Appendectomy |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-1 |
tido:supports |
ripekg:integrity-assessment-hypothesis/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-human-1-2 |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-1 |
tido:supports |
ripekg:integrity-assessment-hypothesis/RIPEAE788FC5E12E564B2-inspectai-1-2 |