ripekg:evaluation/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68 |
prov:used |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68-3 |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68-3 |
dcterms:creator |
ripekg:author/pubpeer-RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68-3Hoya camphorifolia |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68-3 |
dcterms:date |
November 2021 |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68-3 |
http://purl.org/spar/fabio/hasURL |
https://pubpeer.com/publications/9E6CC04E60666CB9B82318B1587C06 |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68-3 |
rdf:type |
http://purl.org/spar/fabio/Comment |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68-3 |
rdf:type |
rdfs:Resource |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68-3 |
rdf:type |
owl:Thing |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68-3 |
rdf:type |
ripe:IntegrityAssessmentEvidenceIntegrity assessment evidence |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68-3 |
rdf:type |
ripe:PeerCommentPeer comment |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68-3 |
rdf:type |
tido:Evidence |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68-3 |
prov:wasAttributedTo |
ripekg:source/pubpeerPubPeer |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68-3 |
prov:wasGeneratedBy |
ripekg:evidence-aggregation/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68 |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68-3 |
prov:wasMemberOf |
ripekg:research-integrity-assessment/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68 |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68-3 |
https://schema.org/text |
#2 How could the journal confirm that errors in the data were accidental? Have the editors announced this finding? It is not in the Retraction Note. _"This site is intended to uncover or question data that may appear to have been falsified, fabricated or obtained via unethical routes"_ I cannot speak for the intentions of PubPeer's architects, but I don't believe this is true. People often leave comments about innocent errors in figure assembly, or even to comment positively on papers that deserve wider attention or have corollaries that deserve further exploration. |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68-3 |
ripe:concerns |
ripekg:work/10.3390%2Fv13060989RETRACTED: Effects of a Single Dose of Ivermectin on Viral and Clinical Outcomes in Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infected Subjects: A Pilot Clinical Trial in Lebanon |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68-3 |
tido:supports |
ripekg:integrity-assessment-hypothesis/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68-human-1-2 |
ripekg:peer-comment/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68-3 |
tido:supports |
ripekg:integrity-assessment-hypothesis/RIPEA3F7A45FD29B97F68-inspectai-1-2 |