Does Increased Consolidated Nighttime Sleep Facilitate Attentional Control? A Pilot Study of Nap Restriction in Preschoolers

Assessed by RV014 · Research Fellow

Assessed on 5 Nov 2025

OverallReviewer's overall integrity assessment, derived from all research questions Some concerns

DOI 10.1177/1087054715569281 (opens in new tab)

Resource ripekg:research-integrity-assessment/RIPEAED5EF0F8F68146B1

5 Research Questions · 3 Evidence Items

Q1.1 — Does the study have an associated retraction?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo

Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: I agree with INSPECT-AI

Q1.2 — Does the study have an associated expression of concern or other relevant post-publication notice?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo

Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: I agree with INSPECT-AI

Q1.3 — Do other studies by the research team highlight causes for concern?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemYes

Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsYes

Rationale: I agree with INPECT-AI

Supporting Evidence (1)

Retraction NoticeSource: Retraction Watch database

An innovative noninvasive respiratory stress test indicates significant coronary artery disease

10.1016/j.carrev.2011.01.003

Journal: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine: Including Molecular InterventionsPublisher: ElsevierDate: 1 Mar 2011

RetractionWatch ID:Record identifier in the Retraction Watch database 1894

Rationale: Error in Data;Bias Issues or Lack of Balance

About Author: Steven Scharf

Retracts: 10.1016/j.carrev.2009.09.005

Q2.2 — Are there concerns relating to the timing or absence of study registration?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemUnclear

Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsUnclear

Rationale: I agree with INSPECT-AI

Supporting Evidence (2)

Clinical Trial RegistrationSource: Clinical trial registry (e.g. ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN)

No trial registration found

Assessment Rationale:How INSPECT-AI determined the prospective registration status by comparing dates LLM-extracted recruitment start date (normalized_date) is missing or empty.

Study Design EvidenceDates and timelines extracted by INSPECT-AI from the publication text

Recruitment Start: N/A

Recruitment Start Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the recruitment start date No recruitment start date found after a full search.

Recruitment End: N/A

Recruitment End Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the recruitment end date No recruitment finish date found after a full search.

Study End: N/A

Study End Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the study end date No study end date found after a full search.

Overall — What is the overall integrity assessment of the study?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemN/A

Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsSome concerns

Rationale: I would rate this as some concerns due to one of the authors being associated with a retracted article and lack of information about trial registration.