Back to publication

Managing Obesity in Young Children: A Multiple Methods Study Assessing Feasibility, Acceptability, and Implementation of a Multicomponent, Family-Based Intervention

Assessed by RV017 · Evidence Synthesis Methodolodgy Editor

Assessed on 17 Mar 2026

OverallReviewer's overall integrity assessment, derived from all research questions No concerns

DOI 10.1089/chi.2021.0221 (opens in new tab)

Resource ripekg:research-integrity-assessment/RIPEACA261247E6313C44

5 Research Questions · 3 Evidence Items

Q1.1 — Does the study have an associated retraction?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: No retraction.

Supporting Evidence (1)

Retraction NoticeSource: Retraction Watch database

Interventions for treating obesity in children

10.1002/14651858.cd001872.pub3 (opens in new tab)
Journal: Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsPublisher: WileyDate: 7 Mar 2019

RetractionWatch ID:Record identifier in the Retraction Watch database 30721

Rationale: Retract and Replace;Removed

Q1.2 — Does the study have an associated expression of concern or other relevant post-publication notice?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: No expression of concerns or PubPeer comments.

Q1.3 — Do other studies by the research team highlight causes for concern?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: Nothing found on Retraction Watch.

Q2.2 — Are there concerns relating to the timing or absence of study registration?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: Prospective registration. Dates of recruitment are after registration. Study completion date given in updated clinical trials record: 2019-11-01

Supporting Evidence (2)

Clinical Trial RegistrationSource: Clinical trial registry (e.g. ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN)

Registration ID: NCT03219658

Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry Link: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03219658 (opens in new tab)

Registration Date: 14-07-2017

Prospective:Whether the trial was registered before participant recruitment began Yes

Assessment Rationale:How INSPECT-AI determined the prospective registration status by comparing dates Comparison performed at month level. Registration: 2017-07, LLM Recruitment Start: 2017-10. Deemed prospective at month level.

Study Design EvidenceDates and timelines extracted by INSPECT-AI from the publication text

Recruitment Start: 10-2017

Recruitment Start Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the recruitment start date Methods: 'Between October 2017 and March 2020, we studied STOMP-EY using multiple methods'; no specific day found.

Recruitment End: 07-2019

Recruitment End Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the recruitment end date Methods: 'Recruitment occurred from October 2017 to July 2019'.

Study End: 03-2020

Study End Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the study end date Methods: 'Between October 2017 and March 2020, we studied STOMP-EY using multiple methods'; no specific study end date found.

Overall — What is the overall integrity assessment of the study?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemN/A
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo concerns

Rationale: No concerns with retractions or with timing of registration and recruitment.