Back to publication

Expression of Concern: The effects of melatonin supplementation on mental health, metabolic and genetic profiles in patients under methadone maintenance treatment

Assessed by RV019 · Evidence Synthesis Methdos Lead

Assessed on 8 Mar 2026

OverallReviewer's overall integrity assessment, derived from all research questions Serious concerns

DOI 10.1111/adb.12650 (opens in new tab)

Resource ripekg:research-integrity-assessment/RIPEAC60164BBD59BB4A3

5 Research Questions · 59 Evidence Items

Q1.1 — Does the study have an associated retraction?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: No rationale provided

Supporting Evidence (1)

Retraction NoticeSource: Retraction Watch database

Melatonin administration lowers biomarkers of oxidative stress and cardio-metabolic risk in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary heart disease: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

10.1016/j.clnu.2025.08.014 (opens in new tab)
Journal: Clinical NutritionPublisher: ElsevierDate: 26 Sept 2025

RetractionWatch ID:Record identifier in the Retraction Watch database 67384

Rationale: Concerns/Issues About Data;Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions;Investigation by Journal/Publisher;Investigation by Third Party;Objections by Author(s);Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions

About Authors: Zatollah Asemi, Vahidreza Ostadmohammadi, Fariba Raygan, Russel Reiter, Fereshteh Bahmani

Retracts: Melatonin administration lowers biomarkers of oxidative stress and cardio-metabolic risk in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary heart disease: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial10.1016/j.clnu.2017.12.004 (opens in new tab)

Q1.2 — Does the study have an associated expression of concern or other relevant post-publication notice?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemYes
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsYes

Rationale: No rationale provided

Supporting Evidence (2)

PubPeer ThreadSource: PubPeer.com — post-publication peer review comments

https://pubpeer.com/publications/6E649C2ECB97A6E7412ADF05B576FF (opens in new tab)

PubPeer CommentSource: PubPeer.com — a platform for post-publication peer review

Commenter: Andrew GreyDate: 1 May 2021

There are many concerns about the integrity of 172 publications by this research group, including this one. Some of the concerns are published 1. Anaesthesia 2020;75:1683–92, see Supplementary data. This paper is A132 2. Account Res 2020;28:149-61. 3. J Clin Epidemiol 2021;131:22-29. Journals and publishers were notified of these concerns in July 2019. 18 publications have an expression of concern, and 6 have been retracted. To our knowledge there has been no public response about any of the concerns. We think these publications are unreliable

Thread: https://pubpeer.com/publications/6E649C2ECB97A6E7412ADF05B576FF (opens in new tab)

PubPeer CommentSource: PubPeer.com — a platform for post-publication peer review

Commenter: Elisabeth M BikDate: 1 Apr 2025

Expression of Concern, found here: "This Expression of Concern is for the above article, published online on 27 June 2018 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), and has been published by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Rainer Spanagel, Society for the Study of Addiction, and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Expression of Concern has been agreed due to concerns raised regarding the integrity of the research and discrepancies in reporting. An investigation has been conducted by the National Committee for Ethics in Biomedical Research Iran, in coordination with Kashan University of Medical Sciences (KAUMS). However, without the verification of clinical records there remain sufficient doubts about the feasibility and integrity of the research undertaken. As a result, the journal has decided to issue an Expression of Concern to alert readers."

Thread: https://pubpeer.com/publications/6E649C2ECB97A6E7412ADF05B576FF (opens in new tab)

Q1.3 — Do other studies by the research team highlight causes for concern?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemYes
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsYes

Rationale: No rationale provided

Supporting Evidence (54)

Retraction NoticeSource: Retraction Watch database

The Effect of Zinc Supplementation on Expressed Levels of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma and Glucose Transporter Type 1 Genes in Newborns of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

10.1007/s12011-016-0788-y (opens in new tab)
Journal: Biological Trace Element ResearchPublisher: SpringerDate: 28 Feb 2021

RetractionWatch ID:Record identifier in the Retraction Watch database 28454

Rationale: Concerns/Issues About Data;Investigation by Company/Institution;Updated to Retraction

About Authors: Mehri Jamilian, Mansooreh Samimi, Esmat Aghadavod

Retraction NoticeSource: Retraction Watch database

Effects of Selenium Supplementation on Gene Expression Levels of Inflammatory Cytokines and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Patients with Gestational Diabetes

10.1007/s12011-017-1045-8 (opens in new tab)
Journal: Biological Trace Element ResearchPublisher: SpringerDate: 28 Feb 2021

RetractionWatch ID:Record identifier in the Retraction Watch database 28465

Rationale: Concerns/Issues About Data;Investigation by Company/Institution

About Authors: Mehri Jamilian, Mansooreh Samimi, Esmat Aghadavod, Faraneh Afshar Ebrahimi

Retraction NoticeSource: Retraction Watch database

The Effect of Zinc Supplementation on Expressed Levels of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma and Glucose Transporter Type 1 Genes in Newborns of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

10.1007/s12011-022-03501-2 (opens in new tab)
Journal: Biological Trace Element ResearchPublisher: SpringerDate: 24 Nov 2022

RetractionWatch ID:Record identifier in the Retraction Watch database 40895

Rationale: Concerns/Issues About Data;Concerns/Issues About Image;Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions;Duplication of/in Article;Investigation by Company/Institution;Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions;Upgrade/Update of Prior Notice(s)

About Authors: Mehri Jamilian, Mansooreh Samimi, Esmat Aghadavod

Q2.2 — Are there concerns relating to the timing or absence of study registration?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemYes
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsYes

Rationale: No rationale provided

Supporting Evidence (2)

Clinical Trial RegistrationSource: Clinical trial registry (e.g. ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN)

Registration ID: IRCT2017072933551N3

Registry: IRCT

Registry Link: https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=IRCT2017072933551N3 (opens in new tab)

Registration Date: 17 Aug 2017

Prospective:Whether the trial was registered before participant recruitment began No

Assessment Rationale:How INSPECT-AI determined the prospective registration status by comparing dates Registration date is after LLM recruitment start date.

Study Design EvidenceDates and timelines extracted by INSPECT-AI from the publication text

Recruitment Start: 03-08-2017

Recruitment Start Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the recruitment start date Methods: 'The subjects were recruited from August 3, 2017 to August 21, 2017'.

Recruitment End: 21-08-2017

Recruitment End Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the recruitment end date Methods: 'The subjects were recruited from August 3, 2017 to August 21, 2017'.

Study End: 20-11-2017

Study End Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the study end date Methods: 'Then, the intervention was conducted among 54 patients undergoing MMT, aged 25-70 years from August 22, 2017 to November 20, 2017'.

Overall — What is the overall integrity assessment of the study?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemN/A
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsSerious concerns

Rationale: No rationale provided