Early wound dressing removal after scheduled cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial

Assessed by RV003 · Research Fellow

Assessed on 4 Nov 2025

OverallReviewer's overall integrity assessment, derived from all research questions No concerns

DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.035 (opens in new tab)

Resource ripekg:research-integrity-assessment/RIPEAB55BD9B848445D35

5 Research Questions · 2 Evidence Items

Q1.1 — Does the study have an associated retraction?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo

Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: No rationale provided

Q1.2 — Does the study have an associated expression of concern or other relevant post-publication notice?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo

Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: No rationale provided

Q1.3 — Do other studies by the research team highlight causes for concern?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo

Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: No rationale provided

Q2.2 — Are there concerns relating to the timing or absence of study registration?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo

Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: No rationale provided

Supporting Evidence (2)

Clinical Trial RegistrationSource: Clinical trial registry (e.g. ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN)

Registration ID: NCT01867567

Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry Link: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01867567 (opens in new tab)

Registration Date: 03-06-2013

Prospective:Whether the trial was registered before participant recruitment began Yes

Assessment Rationale:How INSPECT-AI determined the prospective registration status by comparing dates Comparison performed at month level. Registration: 2013-06, LLM Recruitment Start: 2013-08. Deemed prospective at month level.

Study Design EvidenceDates and timelines extracted by INSPECT-AI from the publication text

Recruitment Start: 08-2013

Recruitment Start Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the recruitment start date Study Design: 'August 2013 through January 2015' used as recruitment start date, no specific day given.

Recruitment End: 01-2015

Recruitment End Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the recruitment end date Study Design: 'August 2013 through January 2015' used as recruitment end date, no specific day given.

Study End: N/A

Study End Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the study end date No explicit study end date given.

Overall — What is the overall integrity assessment of the study?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemN/A

Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo concerns

Rationale: No rationale provided