Back to publication

Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer: Update from a Randomized Clinical Trial of Limited Versus Extended Dissection

Assessed by RV011 · Statistician

Assessed on 17 Nov 2025

OverallReviewer's overall integrity assessment, derived from all research questions No concerns

DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.10.006 (opens in new tab)

Resource ripekg:research-integrity-assessment/RIPEAA29E3E0362BE3ECB

5 Research Questions · 2 Evidence Items

Q1.1 — Does the study have an associated retraction?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: I agree.

Q1.2 — Does the study have an associated expression of concern or other relevant post-publication notice?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: No concerns that I am aware of.

Q1.3 — Do other studies by the research team highlight causes for concern?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: I agree.

Q2.2 — Are there concerns relating to the timing or absence of study registration?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: It seemed clear to me that the study was registered before the first participant was recruited.

Supporting Evidence (2)

Clinical Trial RegistrationSource: Clinical trial registry (e.g. ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN)

Registration ID: NCT01407263

Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry Link: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01407263 (opens in new tab)

Registration Date: 29-07-2011

Prospective:Whether the trial was registered before participant recruitment began Yes

Assessment Rationale:How INSPECT-AI determined the prospective registration status by comparing dates Comparison performed at month level. Registration: 2011-07, LLM Recruitment Start: 2011-10. Deemed prospective at month level.

Study Design EvidenceDates and timelines extracted by INSPECT-AI from the publication text

Recruitment Start: 10-2011

Recruitment Start Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the recruitment start date Methods: 'Between October 2011 and March 2017, 1432 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were enrolled at a single center.' so recruitment start is October 2011

Recruitment End: 03-2017

Recruitment End Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the recruitment end date Methods: 'Between October 2011 and March 2017, 1432 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were enrolled at a single center.' so recruitment finish is March 2017

Study End: N/A

Study End Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the study end date No explicit study end date found.

Overall — What is the overall integrity assessment of the study?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemN/A
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo concerns

Rationale: None of the checks caused any concern and I am not aware of any other concerns which have been raised regarding this study.