Back to publication

The Effectiveness of a Culturally Sensitive Cognitive Behavioral Group Intervention for Latino Alzheimer’s Caregivers

Assessed by RV001 · Medical statistician

Assessed on 31 Oct 2025

OverallReviewer's overall integrity assessment, derived from all research questions No concerns

DOI 10.1093/geront/gnu045 (opens in new tab)

Resource ripekg:research-integrity-assessment/RIPEA78952CB23D648F1D

5 Research Questions · 2 Evidence Items

Q1.1 — Does the study have an associated retraction?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: No retraction mentioned on journal website

Q1.2 — Does the study have an associated expression of concern or other relevant post-publication notice?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: No rationale provided

Q1.3 — Do other studies by the research team highlight causes for concern?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: No rationale provided

Q2.2 — Are there concerns relating to the timing or absence of study registration?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemUnclear
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsUnclear

Rationale: No information

Supporting Evidence (2)

Clinical Trial RegistrationSource: Clinical trial registry (e.g. ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN)

No trial registration found

Assessment Rationale:How INSPECT-AI determined the prospective registration status by comparing dates Registry registration date (study_first_submit_qc_date) is missing or empty.

Study Design EvidenceDates and timelines extracted by INSPECT-AI from the publication text

Recruitment Start: 27-09-2013

Recruitment Start Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the recruitment start date Article states, 'Received September 27, 2013' which indicates the start of recruitment.

Recruitment End: 09-04-2014

Recruitment End Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the recruitment end date Article states, 'Accepted April 9, 2014' which indicates the end of recruitment.

Study End: N/A

Study End Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the study end date No study end date found in the text.

Overall — What is the overall integrity assessment of the study?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemN/A
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo concerns

Rationale: INSPECT-AI seems to indicate some concerns because there is no information on trial registration. Personally I don't think this is a major concern for a 2014 publication.