The Effectiveness of a Culturally Sensitive Cognitive Behavioral Group Intervention for Latino Alzheimer’s Caregivers

Assessed by RV016 · Research Manager/Fellow

Assessed on 20 Nov 2025

OverallReviewer's overall integrity assessment, derived from all research questions No concerns

DOI 10.1093/geront/gnu045 (opens in new tab)

Resource ripekg:research-integrity-assessment/RIPEA7794BC49E5FE9B9F

5 Research Questions · 2 Evidence Items

Q1.1 — Does the study have an associated retraction?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo

Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: No rationale provided

Q1.2 — Does the study have an associated expression of concern or other relevant post-publication notice?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo

Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: No rationale provided

Q1.3 — Do other studies by the research team highlight causes for concern?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo

Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: No rationale provided

Q2.2 — Are there concerns relating to the timing or absence of study registration?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemUnclear

Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsUnclear

Rationale: No registration ID given in the paper nor were any dates of recruiment AI above has found the date of paper submission and acceptance and interpreted those as significant trial dates

Supporting Evidence (2)

Clinical Trial RegistrationSource: Clinical trial registry (e.g. ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN)

No trial registration found

Assessment Rationale:How INSPECT-AI determined the prospective registration status by comparing dates Registry registration date (study_first_submit_qc_date) is missing or empty.

Study Design EvidenceDates and timelines extracted by INSPECT-AI from the publication text

Recruitment Start: 27-09-2013

Recruitment Start Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the recruitment start date Article states, 'Received September 27, 2013' which indicates the start of recruitment.

Recruitment End: 09-04-2014

Recruitment End Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the recruitment end date Article states, 'Accepted April 9, 2014' which indicates the end of recruitment.

Study End: N/A

Study End Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the study end date No study end date found in the text.

Overall — What is the overall integrity assessment of the study?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemN/A

Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo concerns

Rationale: Though of note lack of dates of recruitment and of trial registration