Back to publication

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Magnesium-Zinc-Calcium-Vitamin D Co-supplementation Improves Hormonal Profiles, Biomarkers of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Assessed by RV002 · Business Manager

Assessed on 3 Nov 2025

OverallReviewer's overall integrity assessment, derived from all research questions Serious concerns

DOI 10.1007/s12011-017-1085-0 (opens in new tab)

Resource ripekg:research-integrity-assessment/RIPEA3D5A3F568FA2F77D

5 Research Questions · 42 Evidence Items

Q1.1 — Does the study have an associated retraction?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemYes
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsYes

Rationale: Agree - paper has been retracted

Supporting Evidence (1)

Retraction NoticeSource: Retraction Watch database

Magnesium-Zinc-Calcium-Vitamin D Co-supplementation Improves Hormonal Profiles, Biomarkers of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

10.1007/s12011-022-03465-3 (opens in new tab)
Journal: Biological Trace Element ResearchPublisher: SpringerDate: 19 Nov 2022

RetractionWatch ID:Record identifier in the Retraction Watch database 40898

Rationale: Concerns/Issues About Data;Concerns/Issues About Image;Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions;Duplication of/in Article;Error in Data;Investigation by Company/Institution;Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions;Upgrade/Update of Prior Notice(s)

About Authors: Mehri Jamilian, Maryam Maktabi

Retracts: RETRACTED ARTICLE: Magnesium-Zinc-Calcium-Vitamin D Co-supplementation Improves Hormonal Profiles, Biomarkers of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial10.1007/s12011-017-1085-0 (opens in new tab)

Q1.2 — Does the study have an associated expression of concern or other relevant post-publication notice?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemYes
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsYes

Rationale: Agree - paper has issues of concern raised about it, and has since been retracted

Supporting Evidence (3)

PubPeer ThreadSource: PubPeer.com — post-publication peer review comments

https://pubpeer.com/publications/473737BEFA1E6B814531F7CEF8D3BB (opens in new tab)

Expression of ConcernSource: Retraction Watch database

Magnesium-Zinc-Calcium-Vitamin D Co-supplementation Improves Hormonal Profiles, Biomarkers of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

10.1007/s12011-017-1085-0 (opens in new tab)
Journal: Biological Trace Element ResearchPublisher: SpringerDate: 28 Feb 2020

RetractionWatch ID:Record identifier in the Retraction Watch database 28452

Rationale: Concerns/Issues About Data;Investigation by Company/Institution;Updated to Retraction

PubPeer CommentSource: PubPeer.com — a platform for post-publication peer review

Commenter: Andrew GreyDate: 1 May 2021

There are many concerns about the integrity of 172 publications by this research group, including this one. Some of the concerns are published 1. Anaesthesia 2020;75:1683–92, see Supplementary data. This paper is A149 2. Account Res 2020;28:149-61. 3. J Clin Epidemiol 2021;131:22-29. Journals and publishers were notified of these concerns in July 2019. 18 publications have an expression of concern, and 6 have been retracted. To our knowledge there has been no public response about any of the concerns. We think these publications are unreliable

Thread: https://pubpeer.com/publications/473737BEFA1E6B814531F7CEF8D3BB (opens in new tab)

PubPeer CommentSource: PubPeer.com — a platform for post-publication peer review

Commenter: Hoya camphorifoliaDate: 1 Nov 2022

Retracted [19 November 2022](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12011-022-03465-3). The Editors-in-Chief have retracted this article. After publication, several concerns have been raised about the integrity of this article. The article overlaps with another publication by the same author group [1] in terms of reported study timelines, location and sample size, but there is no cross-referencing. The following discrepancies were noted between the two studies: * This article does not mention any metformin treatment, whereas [1] reports that participants were taking 500 mg of metformin per day, increasing to 1500 mg/day over the first 3 weeks. * This article does not mention stratification in the article, whereas [1] indicates that participants were matched for BMI, age, phenotypes A and D and then randomized. * Smokers are only listed as an exclusion criterion in the current article. In addition, this article appears to contain some data errors. * Under the “Study Design” section, it is stated that “Forty PCOS women were randomized (…)”, however, the article describes 60 participants elsewhere. * In the first paragraph of the “Results” section, it is erroneously stated that 60 participants in each group completed the trial. Furthermore, the authors had previously published studies which reported that zinc and selenium supplementation improved clinical outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) [2, 3]. As this clinical trial includes a placebo-controlled arm, concerns have been raised that potential beneficial treatments known to authors appear to have been withheld from this treatment group. An investigation into all the concerns was conducted by the National Committee for Ethics in Biomedical Research (NREC), Ministry of Health and Medical Education. The NREC concluded that there is insufficient evidence that the data was fabricated based on the summary statistics. In line with Iranian legal requirements, the results of their investigation were sent to the Kashan University of Medical Sciences (KAUMS) research ethics committee where Dr. Asemi is based. Of the specific concerns raised in relation to this article, the institution and authors confirmed that both this article and [1] were part of the same project, including inclusion and exclusion criteria, metformin treatment, and stratification. The authors stated that the two studies were differentiated by selecting different primary outcomes based on different biochemical variables. Further, the authors would like to correct the error within their article and confirm that the study included a total of 60 participants. The Editors have determined that the conclusions of this study are unreliable due to omissions in the description of the trial and the selective analysis of the same data set which was presented earlier in [1]. The authors Mehri Jamilian and Zatollah Asemi disagree with this retraction. The author Maryam Maktami has not responded to correspondence regarding this retraction. **References** * [1] Jamilian M, Maktabi M, Asemi Z (2017) A trial on the effects of magnesium-zinc-calcium-vitamin D co-supplementation on glycemic control and markers of cardio-metabolic risk in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Arch Iran Med 20(10):640–645 * [2] Jamilian M et al (2016) Effects of zinc supplementation on endocrine outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Biol Trace Elem Res 170(2):271–278 * [3] Razavi M et al (2016) Selenium supplementation and the effects on reproductive outcomes, biomarkers of inflammation, and oxidative stress in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Horm Metab Res 48(3):185–190

Thread: https://pubpeer.com/publications/473737BEFA1E6B814531F7CEF8D3BB (opens in new tab)

Q1.3 — Do other studies by the research team highlight causes for concern?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemYes
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsYes

Rationale: Agree - two authors have substantial numbers of retractions and the third has some

Supporting Evidence (36)

Retraction NoticeSource: Retraction Watch database

The Effect of Zinc Supplementation on Expressed Levels of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma and Glucose Transporter Type 1 Genes in Newborns of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

10.1007/s12011-016-0788-y (opens in new tab)
Journal: Biological Trace Element ResearchPublisher: SpringerDate: 28 Feb 2021

RetractionWatch ID:Record identifier in the Retraction Watch database 28454

Rationale: Concerns/Issues About Data;Investigation by Company/Institution;Updated to Retraction

About Authors: Mehri Jamilian, Mansooreh Samimi, Esmat Aghadavod

Retraction NoticeSource: Retraction Watch database

Effects of Selenium Supplementation on Gene Expression Levels of Inflammatory Cytokines and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Patients with Gestational Diabetes

10.1007/s12011-017-1045-8 (opens in new tab)
Journal: Biological Trace Element ResearchPublisher: SpringerDate: 28 Feb 2021

RetractionWatch ID:Record identifier in the Retraction Watch database 28465

Rationale: Concerns/Issues About Data;Investigation by Company/Institution

About Authors: Mehri Jamilian, Mansooreh Samimi, Esmat Aghadavod, Faraneh Afshar Ebrahimi

Retraction NoticeSource: Retraction Watch database

The Effect of Zinc Supplementation on Expressed Levels of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma and Glucose Transporter Type 1 Genes in Newborns of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

10.1007/s12011-022-03501-2 (opens in new tab)
Journal: Biological Trace Element ResearchPublisher: SpringerDate: 24 Nov 2022

RetractionWatch ID:Record identifier in the Retraction Watch database 40895

Rationale: Concerns/Issues About Data;Concerns/Issues About Image;Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions;Duplication of/in Article;Investigation by Company/Institution;Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions;Upgrade/Update of Prior Notice(s)

About Authors: Mehri Jamilian, Mansooreh Samimi, Esmat Aghadavod

Q2.2 — Are there concerns relating to the timing or absence of study registration?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemUnclear
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsYes

Rationale: No evidence of registration

Supporting Evidence (2)

Clinical Trial RegistrationSource: Clinical trial registry (e.g. ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN)

No trial registration found

Assessment Rationale:How INSPECT-AI determined the prospective registration status by comparing dates Registry registration date (study_first_submit_qc_date) is missing or empty.

Study Design EvidenceDates and timelines extracted by INSPECT-AI from the publication text

Recruitment Start: 01-2017

Recruitment Start Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the recruitment start date The trial was performed between January 2017 and April 2017, so January 2017 is taken as the recruitment start date.

Recruitment End: N/A

Recruitment End Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the recruitment end date No recruitment finish date was found.

Study End: 04-2017

Study End Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the study end date The trial was performed between January 2017 and April 2017, so April 2017 is taken as the study end date.

Overall — What is the overall integrity assessment of the study?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemSerious concerns
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsSerious concerns

Rationale: Agree - serious concerns