Back to explore

Eff ectiveness of early lens extraction for the treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma (EAGLE): a randomised controlled trial

Assessed by RV011 · Statistician

Assessed on 17 Nov 2025

OverallReviewer's overall integrity assessment, derived from all research questions No concerns

Resource ripekg:research-integrity-assessment/RIPEA3B4591B6CF8537BB

5 Research Questions · 2 Evidence Items

Q1.1 — Does the study have an associated retraction?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: There are no retractions.

Q1.2 — Does the study have an associated expression of concern or other relevant post-publication notice?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: I had uploaded an older version of the paper without a DOI. I have checked online and there is no expression of concern.

Q1.3 — Do other studies by the research team highlight causes for concern?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: No concerns with any other studies by the authors.

Q2.2 — Are there concerns relating to the timing or absence of study registration?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: The registration was done in 2008, so no concerns.

Supporting Evidence (2)

Clinical Trial RegistrationSource: Clinical trial registry (e.g. ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN)

Registration ID: ISRCTN44464607

Registry: ISRCTN

Registry Link: https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=ISRCTN44464607 (opens in new tab)

Registration Date: 23/10/2008

Prospective:Whether the trial was registered before participant recruitment began Yes

Assessment Rationale:How INSPECT-AI determined the prospective registration status by comparing dates Registration date is on or before LLM recruitment start date.

Study Design EvidenceDates and timelines extracted by INSPECT-AI from the publication text

Recruitment Start: 08-01-2009

Recruitment Start Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the recruitment start date Methods: 'From Jan 8, 2009, to Dec 28, 2011, we enrolled patients...'.

Recruitment End: 28-12-2011

Recruitment End Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the recruitment end date Methods: 'From Jan 8, 2009, to Dec 28, 2011, we enrolled patients...'.

Study End: N/A

Study End Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the study end date Results: The final visit was held in December, 2014, but this is not the study end date. No explicit study end date found.

Overall — What is the overall integrity assessment of the study?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemN/A
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo concerns

Rationale: I agree that there are no concerns with the study.