Back to publication

Cost-effectiveness of high flow nasal cannula therapy versus continuous positive airway pressure for non-invasive respiratory support in paediatric critical care

Assessed by RV008 · PhD Candidate

Assessed on 16 Nov 2025

OverallReviewer's overall integrity assessment, derived from all research questions No concerns

DOI 10.1186/s13054-024-05148-y (opens in new tab)

Resource ripekg:research-integrity-assessment/RIPEA0E6BB9EA03F91869

5 Research Questions · 2 Evidence Items

Q1.1 — Does the study have an associated retraction?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: No rationale provided

Q1.2 — Does the study have an associated expression of concern or other relevant post-publication notice?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: No rationale provided

Q1.3 — Do other studies by the research team highlight causes for concern?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: No rationale provided

Q2.2 — Are there concerns relating to the timing or absence of study registration?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemNo
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo

Rationale: No rationale provided

Supporting Evidence (2)

Clinical Trial RegistrationSource: Clinical trial registry (e.g. ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN)

Registration ID: ISRCTN60048867

Registry: ISRCTN

Registry Link: https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=ISRCTN60048867 (opens in new tab)

Registration Date: 19/06/2019

Prospective:Whether the trial was registered before participant recruitment began Yes

Assessment Rationale:How INSPECT-AI determined the prospective registration status by comparing dates Comparison performed at month level. Registration: 2019-06, LLM Recruitment Start: 2019-08. Deemed prospective at month level.

Study Design EvidenceDates and timelines extracted by INSPECT-AI from the publication text

Recruitment Start: 08-2019

Recruitment Start Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the recruitment start date Methods: 'Each RCT (step-up and step-down) recruited 600 patients between August 2019 and November 2021'; no specific day found.

Recruitment End: 11-2021

Recruitment End Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the recruitment end date Methods: 'Each RCT (step-up and step-down) recruited 600 patients between August 2019 and November 2021'; no specific day found.

Study End: 18-03-2022

Study End Rationale:INSPECT-AI's reasoning for how it identified the study end date Methods: 'with last follow-up completed on 18 March 2022'.

Overall — What is the overall integrity assessment of the study?

Automated Assessment:Assessment produced by the automated systemN/A
Human Assessment:Assessment by a domain expert reviewer, informed by AI resultsNo concerns

Rationale: No rationale provided

Assessment: Cost-effectiveness of high flow nasal cannula therapy versus continuous positive airway pressure for non-invasive respiratory support in paediatric critical care | RIPE Knowledge Graph